Comparison of intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and intravenous iron sucrose for the correction of anaemia in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized single-centre study in Nigeria

BACKGROUND Intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and iron sucrose have been used for correction of iron deficiency for many years and have been shown to improve anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is a paucity of head to head comparisons of these parenteral iron preparations. Such comparative efficacy data would be of particular interest in resource-limited African countries, where the majority of CKD patients are unable to afford erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of these two intravenous iron preparations in pre-dialysis CKD patients. METHODS Sixty-seven anaemic pre-dialysis CKD patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups. The low molecular weight iron dextran group (n = 33) received 1000 mg of low molecular weight iron dextran intravenously in four divided doses of 250 mg. The iron sucrose group (n = 34) received 1000 mg of iron sucrose intravenously in five divided doses of 200 mg. Complete blood count, serum creatinine, serum iron, unsaturated iron binding capacity, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation were assessed at baseline. The baseline parameters were repeated in all patients on Day 24. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a rise in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration of ≥1.0 g/dL after iron therapy. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving the primary end point between both arms of the study: [7 (21.9%) low molecular weight iron dextran versus 11 (32.4%) iron sucrose; relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-1.70; P = 0.23]. At Day 24, the mean increase in Hb concentration from baseline was comparable between the two groups: low molecular weight iron dextran 0.4 ± 0.7 g/dL versus iron sucrose 0.6 ± 0.9 g/dL, mean difference 0.2 g/dL (95% CI: -0.26-0.61; P = 0.28). The proportion of patients that experienced at least one or more adverse events was 27.3% in the iron dextran group versus 14.7% in the iron sucrose arm (P = 0.21). CONCLUSION Both intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and intravenous iron sucrose are effective in correcting iron deficiency and anaemia in pre-dialysis CKD patients.